1. Падучева, Успенский 2002 — Падучева Е. В., Успенский В. А. Подлежащее или сказуемое? (Семантический критерий различения подлежащего и сказуемого в биноминативных предложениях) // Успенский В. А. Труды по нематематике. Т. 1. М.: ОГИ, 2002. (Известия АН СССР. Серия литературы и языка. Т. 38. 1979. С. 349—360). [Paducheva E. V., Uspenskij V. A. A subject or a predicate? (A semantic criterion for distinguishing between subject and predicate in binominative sentences) Uspenskij V. A. Trudy po nematematike. Vol. 1. Moscow: OGI, 2002. (Izvestiya AN SSSR. Ser. literatury i yazyka. Vol. 38. 1979. Pp. 349—360).]
2. Croft 2001 — Croft W. Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2001.
3. Dowty 1991 — Dowty D. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language. 1991. Vol. 67. No. 3. Pp. 547—619.
4. Franks, Lavine 2006 — Franks S., Lavine J. E. Case and word order in Lithuanian. Journal of linguistics. 2006. Vol. 42. No. 1. Pp. 239—298.
5. Haspelmath 2001 — Haspelmath M. Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects. (Typological studies in language 46.) Aikhenvald A., Dixon R. M. W., Onishi M. (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001. Pp. 53—84.
6. Keenan, Comrie 1977 — Keenan E., Comrie B. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic inquiry. 1977. Vol. 8. No. 1. Pp. 63—99.
7. Levin 1993 — Levin B. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1993.
8. Livitz 2006 — Livitz I. What’s in a nominative? Implications of Russian non-nominative subjects for a cross-linguistic approach to subjecthood. B. A. Honor’s Thesis, Harvard Univ., 2006.
9. Lambrecht 2000 — Lambrecht K. When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence focus constructions across languages. Studies in language. 2000. Vol. 24. No. 3. Pp. 611—682.
10. Matushansky 2008 — Matushansky O. A case study of predication. Studies in formal Slavic linguistics. (Contributions from formal description of Slavic languages. 6.5.) Marušič F., Žaucer R. (eds). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2008. Pp. 213—239.
