1. Апресян Р.Г. Феномен универсальности в этике: формы концептуализации // Вопросы философии. 2016. № 8. C. 79–88.
2. Кант И. Сочинения на немецком и русском языках: в 5 т. Метафизика нравов: в 2 ч. Т. 5, ч. 2: Метафизические основные начала учения о добродетели / под ред. Н.В. Мотрошиловой, А.Н. Круглова, Б. Дерфлингера, Д. Хюнинга. М.: Канон+: РООИ «Реабилитация», 2019.
3. Andrade J. Morally-Demanding Infinite Responsibility: The Supererogatory Attitude of Levinasian Normativity. Cham: Springer, 2021.
4. Archer A., Ridge M. The Heroism Paradox: Another Paradox of Supererogation. Philosophical Studies. 2015. Vol. 172, N 6. P. 1575–1592.
5. Atkins P., Nance I. Defending the Suberogatory. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy. 2017. Vol. 9(1). P. 1–8.
6. Baron M. Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.
7. Dentsoras D. The Birth of Supererogation. Epoche. 2014. Vol. 18, N 2. P. 351–372.
8. Driver J. The Suberogatory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1992. Vol. 70. P. 286–296.
9. Flescher A.M. Heroes, Saints, and Ordinary Morality. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003.
10. Heyd D. Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
11. Hill T.E. Kant on Imperfect Duties and Supererogation. Kant-Studien. 1971. Vol. 62, N 1–4. P. 55–76.
12. Keller S. Partiality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.
13. Mellema G. Beyond the Call of Duty: Supererogation, Obligation, and Offence. Albany: SUNY Press, 1991.
14. Urmson J.O. Saints and Heroes. Essays in Moral Philosophy, ed. by A.I. Melden. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958. P. 198–216.